Skip to main content

Joesy

Content Warning: These stories are about violence, abuse, neglect and exploitation and may include references to suicide or self-harming behaviours. They may contain graphic descriptions and strong language and may be distressing. Some narratives may be about First Nations people who have passed away. If you need support, please see Contact & support.

Joesy, early 50s, is blind.

As a student, she felt invisible and ‘profoundly isolated’, she told the Royal Commission.

‘Legally blind and visually impaired students were not treated as students, let alone people, and were not treated with dignity.’

At school, Joesy used braille and audio to access information. One school refused to provide any materials in these formats.

‘Trying to gain access to handouts and braille textbooks was extremely difficult or virtually impossible.’

Another school refused to make any adjustments for Joesy so she could study a language orally without having to write it.

Schools never gave Joesy her report cards in a format she could access.

‘I also would have liked to have seen my file in braille … because I am a real person and not a fictional character in a book.’

In her final year of high school, teachers never included her in employment programs. She didn’t get to complete work experience, practise being interviewed or learn how to write a CV.

Joesy was ‘bitterly disappointed’ the school didn’t give her a reference.

‘I attended all the swimming and running sports carnivals, concerts and workshops that the school conducted. I was hardly ever absent.’

Following school Joesy went to TAFE, but only lasted half a day.

The coordinator didn’t realise Joesy was blind when she accepted her into the course. She told Joesy that she couldn’t continue because she wouldn’t be able to complete the first aid part of the course.

‘I had to go home by taxi all alone and distraught. I did not receive any emotional counselling from the TAFE.’

Joesy decided to prove the coordinator wrong and successfully completed the course at a different institution.

At university, Joesy had to stop using her braille machine because students complained it was too noisy.

Joesy returned to study at TAFE a few years ago. This time, she is involved in a student telelink group.

Telelink is a service that connects people for facilitated group sessions by phone or video conferencing. Blind and visually impaired students meet once a month to discuss issues such as the NDIS, support dogs, access to course materials, advocacy and technology.

Joesy likes using the telelink service because she can hear a person’s voice.

‘The telelink service I am involved with means that I am at home and can converse with other legally blind and visually impaired adults all around Australia. I am also in a safe environment and do not have to catch a taxi home in the dark at night.’

Joesy says a peer telelink program would have made an enormous difference to her when she was in high school.

‘That is why I would like very much to see a telelink group … for students who are currently studying at secondary school.’

Students could discuss issues relating to school and exams.

‘No student should have to put on a brave front. It is perfectly all right to say, “I failed an exam” or “Well I could have done better” or “I passed with flying colours.”’

Students could also talk about relationshipsromantic and platonic – and discuss strategies for building friendships and dealing with bullying. They could also share tips about new technology and discuss better ways to communicate.

‘Peer support is so very imperative. I cannot tell you how imperative this is particularly when adolescents are vulnerable.’

Joesy says it is vital for legally blind and visually impaired adolescents and adults to have a voice ‘to discuss inclusion and integration within our community, which would help to conquer barriers to education’.

Settings and contexts
 

Disclaimer: This is the story of a person who shared their personal experience with the Royal Commission into Violence, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation of People with Disability through a submission or private session. The names in this story are pseudonyms. The person who shared this experience was not a witness and their account is not evidence. They did not take an oath or affirmation before providing the story. Nothing in this story constitutes a finding of the Royal Commission. Any views expressed are those of the person who shared their experience, not of the Royal Commission.