Skip to main content

Overview of responses to the Emergency planning and response Issues paper (Auslan)

  • Auslan translation
Publication date

Overview of responses to the Emergency planning and response Issues paper

Introduction

The Disability Royal Commission published an issues paper on Emergency planning and response in April 2020. 

The issues paper asked for feedback about the experiences of people with disability in planning for and responding to emergencies. It also asked what can be done to make people with disability safer during emergencies, like bushfires and the recent COVID-19 pandemic.

We received a total of 69 responses to the issues paper. We have published a summary document of what we were told in these responses. The responses will help inform our work and our recommendations to make a better, safer society for people with disability, including in emergencies.

What did the responses say?

People told us that Australia is not prepared for emergencies. This has a big impact on people with disability who may already be disadvantaged. Their situation may get worse during emergencies.

We also heard about the different needs of people with disability across all stages of emergencies. And we heard about how strong people with disability are during crises.

We were told about the things that contribute to violence, abuse, neglect and exploitation of people with disability during emergencies like:

  • government responses – people with disability being left behind and overlooked across government emergency planning responses
  • access to services – people being unable to access disability support workers to provide support for daily living
  • supports and other essentials people with disability being unable to access financial support from the government, making it hard to buy important things like personal protective equipment during the pandemic
  • access to information – throughout emergencies there not being enough accessible information, it was late, or it was confusing, especially for people living in places like group homes. Some deaf organisations said there needs to be regular information through Auslan, captioning and tactile communication methods.
  • safeguards and oversight – people with disability in segregated settings, such as group homes and segregated work places, face particular risks during emergencies because there is a lack of natural safeguards from families or visitors.
  • social isolation – many people with disability had no face-to-face connection with other people during the pandemic, or no access to the internet. People said that being isolated like this may increase risk of violence, abuse, neglect and exploitation and it had a negative impact on their mental wellbeing
  • barriers across service systems – accessing services, like education, during the pandemic was even harder for people with disability. For example, young autistic people struggled to move to home learning because of lack of the right support and loss of accommodation provided by mainstream schools.

People proposed changes across a range of areas, such as:

  • including people with disability across all levels of emergency planning and response
  • making information more accessible
  • keeping community connections alive
  • having systems in place that keep people with disability safe, including proper oversight and ways to complain.

More information

For more information about the summary document, and to read people’s responses to the issues paper, visit the Policy & research section on our website.

www.disability.royalcommission.gov.au